E-Readers to Replace Text Books (Right or Wrong)
Comments
My wife (an editor) says that the problem is large and detailed illustrations and
photographs.
Literature with no pictures? no sweat.
A biology text with
hundreds of illustrations? Problem.
I've prolonged the purchase of a Kindle for a number of reasons.
I am not as
much a traditionalist as an observer of technological advancements. I'd rather let others
be the test subjects for a new technology, rather than myself, because it affords me the
opportunity to examine their reviews of the product (which, to me, are the most honest and
objective advertisements or criticisms, as far as objectivity goes).
Amazon, of
course, panders to consumerists, leading them to believe that they are missing out on some
sort of revolution if they don't order the product immediately, but I don't buy it. And
even if I did buy it, my revolutionary piece of hardware will become obsolete at the
release of another version. Juxtapose the hideous form and limited functionality of the
first Kindle with the latest one and you'll see what I mean.
This obviously means
that I am not a consumerist, or a technophile. Novelty itself isn't a convincing enough
advertisement for a new technology. I'd rather wait until its actual functionality nets
more praise than its form because, at present, the instrumental value of the Kindle is
approximately 0.



Admittedly, I'd probably be thousands of dollars richer right now if I had downloaded
all my books rather than paying full price for them.
I have a problem that
manifests when I come within a certain proximity of a book store.
So e-readers will
have their place in the (my) future as will good 'ol parchment. We're not exactly talking
automobile versus horse and buggy, here.